Penalties for Plagiarism in Us and Uk Academic Institutions free essay sample

Penalties for Plagiarism in US and UK Academic Institutions Outline Plagiarism is a serious crime and needs to get handled through penalties. The penalties related to plagiarism has been dealt under strict structure, by the US and UK Institutions. It is under certain rules that the attempt has been made to fight with plagiarism. This paper highlights these rules and forwards some specific interpretations related to the practical practices. Introduction Plagiarism has been defined by WordNet (3. 0) as a piece of writing that has been copied from someone else and is presented as being your own work. It is a practice where a person imitates another person’s work and declares it to be his own. It is a common practice within academia. This is a practice that has been mostly found among students, researchers and even professors. It is definitely not correct to imitate other’s thought and to declare it as one’s own. We will write a custom essay sample on Penalties for Plagiarism in Us and Uk Academic Institutions or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page It is like getting hold over someone’s property without any notification, and that is very illegal. Innovative thoughts add resources to the developmental proceedings of social context. These thoughts should be provided proper acknowledgements and a negation to the process of acknowledgement should be considered as an illegal approach. Thesis Statement To interpret the penalties meant for plagiarism in US and UK Academic Institutions Anti-plagiarism Policy implemented by US and UK Academic Institutions The institutions of US and UK follow Plagiarism and fraud policy and Data Protection policy to achieve a strategic anti-plagiarism approach. These institutions scrutinise between deliberate cheating and the process of unintentional or inadvertent plagiarism. They also consider Human Rights Act, while dealing with cases of plagiarism and provide enough caution (Stevens, Young Calabrese 245). In order to gain effective anti-plagiarism approach, the institutions need to have a combination of well structured and technologically supported consistent disciplinary methodology (McGowan 291). By the implementation of consistent learning as well as teaching strategies, these institutions can make the student well aware of illegal approaches of plagiarism. This can be well incorporated in them during their â€Å"academic apprenticeship†. Carroll and Appleton declare that the anti-plagiarism policies implemented by UK and US institutions, are directly related to the penalties of expulsions, degree withheld and severe fines (6). However to prevent plagiarism, these institutions motivate the students, in being careful with plagiarism. In case of practicing plagiarism in US and UK institutions, the authority of the particular institution has got the authority to take any kind of academic action against the student. This gets considered as a means to establish anti-plagiarism policy in the institution. All kinds of database rights are within the European Union, however there are instances when interventions are led into this jurisdiction and the research data get copied. Anti-plagiarism policy prevents these databases from being copied and thus tries to keep them from getting plagiarized. There are various sources of misrepresentation; that deal with the intrusion of authorship declaration to another person’s research. This gets noticed under anti-plagiarism policy, as a matter of pure fraud. The policies also look into the violation of copyright or any other party rights, under the persuasion of Copyright Designs and Patents Act. Penalties Imposed on Students caught Plagiarizing Plagiarism has been considered as academic dishonesty by the US and UK institutions. Through legal approaches, it has been designated as academic fraud; to which the offender is very much subject to academic censure. In the academic institutions of the US and the UK, plagiarism penalties can be inclusive of fines and can get extended to expulsion. For these institutions, plagiarism has been concerned with the matter of unearned increment by means of plagiarizing authors contribution achieved through the ways of false claims of having the authorship. The penalties on plagiarism in academic institutions of US and UK can be enlisted as withheld of degree, cancellation of degree, expulsion from the University, heavy fines and loss of year or years. As stated by Brannan penalties for plagiarism are implemented through following process (45) – ?For 1st offense: The Parents or the Guardian gets notified. The student gets zero-grade for the submitted work. He is also declared ineligible for receiving National Honour Society ? For 2nd offense: The act of plagiarism as 2nd offense means a repetition and that can result for 3 day suspension. Eventually the Parent or the Guardian is called to conference all the matters included in the subsequent offenses. Every issue of plagiarism then gets dealt through case by case basis. Heavy Penalties are Justifiable According to my personal interpretations, it is very necessary to declare all the sources that inspire a research to develop in a right manner. In this process the contributions made by all the scholars are very necessary. Since the motive of every educational institute is to make the student or the scholar, learn more through personalized involvement; it is always important for the individual to participate in the process. This can be attained by providing authentic analysis and declarations of thoughts that are collected from various sources. Considering the former scholars in understanding a topic is highly appreciated by these institutions. However while making a declaration it is important to acknowledge their efforts and add their contributions in gaining the specified knowledge. If someone ignores this context and declares other’s statement as his own, then he should be seriously penalized. Having a common thought can be possible, but the expression of the thought in exact order and words is pure cheating. It is unethical to copy others innovative ideas and to declare it as personal. Fines and imprisonments should be availed for all these practices. Conclusion Eventually, it can be well concluded that the process of imitating and copying the thoughts and languages can lead to a serious setback to one’s career. It is worth to note that every research needs to have a promotional and futuristic thought. It is important to provide the same by pursuing personal knowledge and analytical skills. Dishonesty in this persuasion can lead to serious penalties and the researcher or the student can lose his career. To make declaration of every source should be considered seriously and should be always enlisted at the end of the document in proper format. Works Cited Brannan, Joyce A. Technical Services Librarian, Julia Tutwiler Library, University of West Alabama, Livingston, Alabama. 2005. Web. 9th Dec. 2009] Carroll, Jude Appleton, Jude. Good practice guide to plagiarism. London: Oxford Brookes University. 2001 McGowan, Ursula. Plagiarism detection and prevention: Are we putting the cart before the horse? Proceedings of the 2005. 2005HERDSA Annual Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 28 287-293 Stevens, Jason M. Young, Michael F. Calabrese, Thomas. Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 233-254. 2007 WordNet. Definition of Plagiarism. Web 10th Dec. 2009 http://wordnetweb. princeton. edu/perl/webwn? s=plagiarism